Heterotrophy in the Mediterranean symbiotic coral Cladocora caespitosa: comparison with two other scleractinian species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experimental study assessed the grazing rates of the Mediterranean symbiotic coral Cladocora caespitosa on the 4 main food sources available in its natural environment: detrital particulate organic matter (DPOM) and pico-, nano-, and microzooplankton. These rates were compared to the rates of 2 other scleractinian symbiotic species, the Mediterranean coral Oculina patagonica and the tropical coral Turbinaria reniformis. Results showed that C. caespitosa was the species with the highest grazing rates of pico-and nanoplankton, which contributed to more than half of the carbon supplied by photosynthesis. The daily heterotrophic carbon (C) input from these prey (at in situ concentrations) was 88.3 22.9, 16.9 8.2, and 17.6 4.3 g C cm -2 d -1 for C. caespitosa, O. patagonica, and T. reniformis, respectively, corresponding to a percent contribution of heterotrophically acquired C to daily animal respiration (CHAR) of 119.8, 28.7, and 15.9%, respectively. C. caespitosa was also able to derive a significant part of its carbon needs from the grazing of microzooplankton and DPOM. Indeed, considering the in situ concentrations, the daily heterotrophic C input from microzooplankton and DPOM would be 32.6 and 10.0 g C cm -2 d -1 , giving a CHAR estimation of 44.2 and 13.6%, respectively. Heterotrophy therefore plays a major role in the energy budget of this temperate species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".