Solvent Mixture Induced Self Assembly of a Terthiophene Based Rod–Coil Block Co-oligomer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the synthesis and self-assembly of a terthiophene-oligostyrene based block co-oligomer Ter-OSa. While the self-assembly of block copolymers is normally achieved using block-selective solvents, tetrahydrofuran (THF) is a good solvent for both terthiophene and oligostyrene blocks. The self-assembly in this case arises with the nonsolvent (H(2)O) in THF/H(2)O mixtures. The absorption spectra showed a blue shift and fluorescence spectra showed quenching of fluorescence with increasing water content indicating that the Ter-OSa self-assembled to form H-aggregates. The morphology was studied using scanning electron microscopy. Depending upon the amount of water the Ter-OSa undergoes morphological transition from hollow to rigid spheres. However at higher water content the Ter-OSa formed large spheres from the fusion of smaller spheres. A mechanism of morphological transition from hollow spheres to rigid spheres is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".