Dynamic Behaviour and Performance Evaluation of Tuned Liquid Dampers (TLDs) Using Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tuned liquid dampers (TLDs) are cost effective and low-maintenance dynamic vibration absorbers that are being used in flexible and lightly damped structures. A TLD is a passive control device that dissipates energy through the liquid boundary layer friction, the free surface contamination, and wave breaking. In this paper the dynamic behaviour and performance of TLDs are investigated through a series of the real time hybrid simulations on a steel frame equipped with a TLD on the roof level. The tests were carried out using a Quanser shaking table, and by implementing the real-time hybrid simulation algorithms in MATLAB Simulink, Real-time Workshop and WINCON. By combining computer simulation with physical testing, the real-time hybrid simulation method provides the response of the structure-TLD system by only testing the TLD. This way, the structure-TLD interaction will be captured without testing a scaled-down model of the entire system in the laboratory. By better understanding the TLD behaviour and its interaction with the structure, the results presented here will contribute to the improved design of the TLDs which will in turn result in the wider application of these devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it