Fe<sup>III</sup> Bipyrrolidine Phenoxide Complexes and Their Oxidized Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fe(III) complexes of the symmetric (2S,2'S)-[N,N'-bis(1-(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenylmethyl))]-2,2'-bipyrrolidine (H2L(1)) and dissymmetric (2S,2'S)-[N,N'-(1-(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenylmethyl))-2-(pyridylmethyl)]-2,2'-bipyrrolidine (HL(2)) ligands incorporating the bipyrrolidine backbone were prepared, and the electronic structure of the neutral and one-electron oxidized species was investigated. Cyclic voltammograms (CV) of FeL(1)Cl and FeL(2)Cl2 showed expected redox waves corresponding to the oxidation of phenoxide moieties to phenoxyl radicals, which was achieved by treating the complexes with 1 equiv of a suitable chemical oxidant. The clean conversion of the neutral complexes to their oxidized forms was monitored by UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy, where an intense π-π* transition characteristic of a phenoxyl radical emerged ([FeL(1)Cl](+•): 25,500 cm(-1) (9000 M(-1) cm(-1)); [FeL(2)Cl2](+•): 24,100 cm(-1) (8300 M(-1) cm(-1)). The resonance Raman (rR) spectra of [FeL(1)Cl](+•) and [FeL(2)Cl2](+•) displayed the characteristic phenoxyl radical ν7a band at 1501 and 1504 cm(-1), respectively, confirming ligand-based oxidation. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy exhibited a typical high spin Fe(III) (S = 5/2) signal for the neutral complexes in perpendicular mode. Upon oxidation, a signal at g ≈ 9 was observed in parallel mode, suggesting the formation of a spin integer system arising from magnetic interactions between the high spin Fe(III) center and the phenoxyl radical. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations further supports this formulation, where weak antiferromagnetic coupling was predicted for both [FeL(1)Cl](+•) and [FeL(2)Cl2](+•).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".