MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of amisulpride on consummatory negative contrast

2002· article· en· W2331420218 on OpenAlex
Rachel F. Genn, Alasdair M. Barr, Anthony G. Phillips

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioural Pharmacology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Association for PsychopharmacologyRoyal SocietyWellcome Trust
KeywordsAmisulprideChlordiazepoxideSucrosePharmacologyChemistryAnxiolyticInternal medicineMedicineAntipsychoticPsychiatryBiochemistryDiazepamSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two groups of rats, 'shifted' (32-4% sucrose) and 'unshifted' (4-4% sucrose), were given access to sucrose solutions for 5 min/day for 10 days. On day 11, shifted animals had access to a devalued incentive (4% sucrose) and subgroups of each group received doses of amisulpride (10 or 60 mg/kg, i.p.) or its vehicle before a 10-min access period to sucrose solutions. Lick frequency was measured both pre- and post-shift. A high dose of amisulpride reduced successive negative contrast (SNC) after a brief period of exposure to the devalued stimulus, whereas a low dose had no effect. The acute effects of high doses of amisulpride seem to act on contrast effects in a similar way to anxiolytic compounds such as the benzodiazepine, chlordiazepoxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it