Engineering Geophysics (John Nicholl Memorial Session)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext You have accessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2015Engineering Geophysics (John Nicholl Memorial Session)Authors: Sonja MackensThomas FechnerNeida I. C. RiosDaryl TweetonJulio C.G. GuerrerosErnst NiederleithingerSvyatoslav KhalatovEvgeni BalkovVladimir OlenchenkoBrent RosenbladFrancisco GomezJ.E. LoehrJoseph GilliamTed AschJared AbrahamTodd MeglichLeti WodajoChung SongCraig HickeyDouglas MacLeanAlastair McClymontColin MiazgaNarasimman SundararajanMohammed Al-WardiAbdelmoneam Raef*Sonja MackensGeotomographie GmbH, Neuwied, Germany, Thomas FechnerGeotomographie GmbH, Neuwied, Germany, Neida I. C. RiosTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, Daryl TweetonGeoTom LLC, Apple Valley, Minnesota, Julio C.G. GuerrerosBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany, Ernst NiederleithingerBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany, Svyatoslav KhalatovNovosibirsk State University, Evgeni BalkovInstitute of Petroleum-Gas Geology and Geophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladimir OlenchenkoINGG SB RAS, Brent RosenbladUniversity of Missouri, Francisco GomezUniversity of Missouri, J.E. LoehrUniversity of Missouri, Joseph GilliamReitz and Jens, Ted AschXRI Geophysics, Jared AbrahamXRI Geophysics, Todd MeglichXRI Geophysics, Leti WodajoThe University of Mississippi, Chung SongThe University of Mississippi, Craig HickeyNational Center for Physical Acoustics, Douglas MacLeanWorleyParsons Canada Services Ltd., Alastair McClymontWorleyParsons, Colin MiazgaWorleyParsons, Narasimman SundararajanSultan Qaboos University, Mohammed Al-WardiSultan Qaboos University, and Abdelmoneam Raef*Kansas State Universityhttps://doi.org/10.4133/SAGEEP.28-020 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract The individual abstracts for this session are available to read in the PDF. Keywords: Jet grouting, grouted column, column diameter, seismic tomography; Geophysics, electrotomography, sounding, frequency, sensor, remote sensing, interferometry, radar, ground-based, rockfall, DC, resistivity, planning, modification, Seismic refraction tomogram, ERT, EM, Cross-plot analysis, levee; ERT, Seismic, MASW, Pipeline, Engineering; micro-gravity, VLF EM, carbonates, rock strengthPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/SAGEEP.28-020FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2015ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2015 Pages: 699 publication data© 2015 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished Online: 26 Mar 2015 CITATION INFORMATION Sonja Mackens, Thomas Fechner, Neida I. C. Rios, Daryl Tweeton, Julio C.G. Guerreros, Ernst Niederleithinger, Svyatoslav Khalatov, Evgeni Balkov, Vladimir Olenchenko, Brent Rosenblad, Francisco Gomez, J.E. Loehr, Joseph Gilliam, Ted Asch, Jared Abraham, Todd Meglich, Leti Wodajo, Chung Song, Craig Hickey, Douglas MacLean, Alastair McClymont, Colin Miazga, Narasimman Sundararajan, Mohammed Al-Wardi, and Abdelmoneam Raef*, (2015), "Engineering Geophysics (John Nicholl Memorial Session)," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 135-141. https://doi.org/10.4133/SAGEEP.28-020 Plain-Language Summary KeywordsJet groutinggrouted columncolumn diameterseismic tomography; Geophysicselectrotomographysoundingfrequencysensorremote sensinginterferometryradarground-basedrockfallDCresistivityplanningmodificationSeismic refraction tomogramERTEMCross-plot analysislevee; ERTSeismicMASWPipelineEngineering; micro-gravityVLF EMcarbonatesrock strengthPDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it