MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331591968 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1282974

Bioassay guided fractionation of extracts from flowers of Bellis perennis L. for their anticancer activity

2011· article· en· W2331591968 on OpenAlexaff
F Pehlivan Karakas, Alper Karakaş, Vakhtang Mshvildadze, Jean Legault, André Pichette, Arzu Uçar Türker

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPlant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineFractionationSapogeninDichloromethaneBioassayChemistryChromatographyMedicineBiologyBiochemistrySolventPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common daisy ( Bellis perennis L.) is a member of the cosmopolitan family Compositae (Asteraceae). It is native to western, central, and northern Europe, but is commonly found as an invasive plant in North America (1). B. perennis has been used in the treatment of gastritis, enteritis, diarrhoea, bleeding, rheumatism, inflammation and infections of the upper respiratory tract (2–3). In this study, anticancer activity of crude hexane, dichloromethane, methanol, water extracts, also n-butanol and ethylacetate fractions (after separation of methanol extract) of flowers from Bellis perennis were investigated. Cytotoxic activities were carried out on human lung cancer (A549), human colorectal cancer (DLD-1), and normal skin fibroblasts (WS1) using the resazurin reduction test. Following the bioassay guided fractionation, the most active methanolic extract, was treated by n-butanol and ethylacetate. The n-butanolic fraction was found to be the most active against A-549 lung carcinoma and DLD-1 colon carcinoma cells, with IC 50 values of 16±3 and 10±2µg/ml, respectively. The hexane, dichloromethane and water extracts did not show any significant activity against A-549 and DLD-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanta MedicaSame topicPlant-Derived Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207