Bibliographic record
Abstract
KeywordsAcadian, francophone, mental health, New Brunswick, psychiatry servicesThe term ''Acadian'' refers to the French-speaking people of the Maritime provinces of Canada.1 The history of the Acadians is marked by deportation and colonization, as well as numerous attempts of assimilation.2 Today, francophones make up almost one-third of the population of New Brunswick,3 Canada's only officially bilingual province.4 As mental health professionals living and working in the predominantly francophone region of northeastern New Brunswick, we conducted a literature review with the goal of better understanding the needs of the population we serve and the mental health services available to that population.Our literature search was conducted between October and December of 2014. We searched several databases and online journal archives, using French and English search terms. Given the scarcity of articles found, we decided to include all documents focusing on mental health of Acadians from peer-reviewed journals regardless of article type. In total, only 5 items were found that focused on Acadian mental health in New Brunswick. Despite the scarcity of articles, we were able to identify certain themes that we believe are still relevant today.Historically, multiple challenges have been identified in the provision of mental health services to New Brunswick's Acadian population.5 Thesehaveincludedthe stigma associated with mental illness, the historical isolation of the francophone population, limited funding, difficulty recruiting and retaining nursing staff, limited availability of French language services, and difficulty recruiting psychiatrists who were both linguistically and culturally familiar with the Acadian setting. Furthermore, Acadians seemed to have higher rates of psychiatric admissions and higher rates of involuntary hospitalization, compared with the Canadian average.2 Francophones appeared to have less favourable perceptions of psychiatric services and of effectiveness of medications, compared with anglophones. What was also interesting was that francophones placed more importance on their support groups and family support networks, compared with anglophones, who emphasized the psychiatric institutions, psychiatrists, and clinics as most helpful.6The scarcity of scientific papers highlights the lack of mental health research among Acadians in New Brunswick. We find this surprising, given that francophones constitute almost one-third of New Brunswick's population.3 This lack of research might reflect a lack of funding, lack of educational institutions, or even a lack of interest in studying Acadians. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".