The influence of crop-load, delayed cooling and storage atmosphere on post-storage quality of ‘Honeycrisp’™ apples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SummaryThe influence of crop-load, delayed cooling and storage environment on fruit quality and disorder, and on the incidence of rot was investigated on 7 year-old ‘Honeycrisp’ apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees on ‘Malling 26’ rootstocks at three different sites during 2003 and 2004. Fruit from non-thinned (control) trees, or trees thinned to three, six or nine fruit cm–2 trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) were harvested and: (1) immediately cooled over 24 h to 3°C [commercial (Comm)] then stored at 3°C in refrigerated air (RA) or in a controlled atmosphere (CA; 2.5 kPa O2, 1.0 – 1.5 kPa CO2); or (2) held at 20°C for 6 d, followed by 1 d at 3°C [= 7 d pre-storage warming treatment = delayed cooling (DC)] then stored at 3°C under RA or in CA storage. After 3 and 6 months of storage, fruit mass (g), firmness (N), colour (% red), soluble solids content (SSC; %), titratable acidity (TA; mg malic acid equivalents 100 ml–1 juice), “greasiness” (0–3 scale), the extent of disorders such as soft scald (%) and low temperature breakdown (LTB; %), as well as the incidence of rot (%) were assessed. In general, as crop-load increased fruit mass, firmness, colour, SSC and TA decreased regardless of the effects of DC and storage treatment. Crop-load did not influence fruit “greasiness” and had an inconsistent and less-pronounced effect on soft scald, LTB and rot. The 7 d pre-storage warming treatment reduced the incidence of soft scald and LTB, irrespective of crop-load, but had little influence on other fruit quality measurements. Although the storage environment did not consistently alter quality, CA-stored ‘Honeycrisp’ apples tended to be more acidic, less “greasy” and develop less soft scald. Overall, the data indicate that the highest fruit quality was attained by thinning ‘Honeycrisp’ trees as close to three fruit cm–2 TCSA as possible, by subjecting newly-harvested fruit to a 7 d pre-storage warming period of 20°C, followed by CA storage at 2.5 kPa O2, 1 – 1.5 kPa CO2 at 3°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".