MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331780160 · doi:10.2118/1206-0033-jpt

Lower Tertiary Trend: A Study in the Impact of Advancing Technology

2006· article· en· W2331780160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane Langley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChevron (anatomy)GeologyDrillingTest (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)ArchaeologyEngineeringPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2002, few believed that Lower Tertiary sands would be present, let alone productive. Today these defiant sands are reshaping the industry's appraisal of plays in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). Back in 2002, supermajor Chevron and independent Devon formed a joint venture to explore and exploit the deep Wilcox formation. According to both, new and emerging technology has been and continues to be the differentiator in both the exploration and exploitation efforts in these deep structural targets and has the potential to create a shock wave on financial portfolios. The Jack-2 well test took place in the second quarter of 2006 at Walker Ridge Block 758 in 7,000 ft of water, and more than 20,000 ft under the seafloor, breaking Chevron's 2004 Tahiti well-test record as the deepest successful well test in the GOM. Chevron, Devon, and Statoil announced that it was a record-setting production test, with the test representing approximately 40% of the total net pay measured in the Jack-2 well. National Geographic recently gave an apt description of industry achievement in the Lower Tertiary trend: "…you're looking at where in the GOM to drill an 80- to 100-million-dollar well that will ultimately be the size of a dinner plate [on the seafloor]." And, according to analysts, it equates to spending U.S. $100 million to drill and construct a well in mile-deep water to as deep as 5.3 miles below sea level beneath a salt canopy. The recent, well-publicized Jack-2 well test is actually the latest of several successes in the play. The Great White and Trident finds by Chevron, located in Alaminos Canyon, were the first, and it is speculated that this trend could extend into the Garden Banks and Green Canyon blocks. "This is truly frontier exploration … pushing boundaries," said Gero Farrugio, Wood Mackenzie Upstream Research Manager for Latin America, the U.S. GOM, and Canada. Other prospects already on record in the GOM Lower Tertiary trend include Cascade in 2002, St. Malo in 2003, the first Jack find in 2004, and Kaskida in 2006. The Jack prospect is located far from any existing platform and pipeline infrastructure. Farrugio points out that while "the Jack-2 test is the first indicator, it is far from proving commerciality of the play." The technology that is being brought to bear to realize the potential of the Lower Tertiary trend is the ingredient that has the potential to bring understanding of this play needed for the creation of infrastructure and ultimately to prove commercial viability. Drilling commenced on the Jack-2 well under 7,000 ft of water and continued to a depth of 28,175 ft. At this depth, pressures can reach 20,000 psi and the temperature of the oil is approximately 200°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207