Topical Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Erosive Pustular Dermatosis of the Scalp
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp (EPDS) is a rare condition characterized by chronic, sterile, pustular erosions leading to scarring alopecia. Although the etiology is unknown, it appears to be associated with ultraviolet light exposure and trauma. Histologic findings include nonspecific atrophy of the epidermis and chronic inflammation. CASE HISTORY: A 71-year-old female presented with a 1-year history of a boggy, erythematous, friable plaque on the vertex of her scalp. A diagnosis of EPDS was made based on presentation, negative cultures, and histologic findings. Initial therapy with intralesional and topical steroids and oral antibiotics resolved the inflamed plaques; however, steroid-induced atrophy became prominent after 5 months of use. The treatment was discontinued, resulting in recurrence of disease. Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was initiated, which has been successfully controlling the lesions with reversal of skin atrophy and clinical evidence of hair growth. CONCLUSION: This is the fourth reported case of the successful treatment of EPDS with topical tacrolimus for the resolution of atrophy and the prevention of relapse of inflammation. Although its long-term use warrants close follow-up for side effects, tacrolimus may constitute a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of EPDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it