The First Record of Ornithocheyletia hallae Smiley, 1970 (Acariformes: Actinedida: Cheyletidae) and Its Prevalance on Pseudolynchia canariensis (Mcquart, 1840) (Diptera: Pupipara: Hippoboscidae) in Turkey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to detect acar species and their prevalence on Pseudolynchia canariensis. METHODS: The pigeons were treated with a carbamate group insectiside in a carton box, kept there for 15-20 minutes and the ectoparasites which fell off the birds onto the bottom of the box collected in a petri dishes. The P. canariensis specimens were examined macroscopically and microscopically for lice and acari. The acar samples were mounted on the slides in Canada balsam after being transparented and identified as to species. RESULTS: A total of 42 P. canariensis specimens were collected from the pigeon. 15 (35.71%) were found to be infested with the acari, while no louse specimen was detected. Forty-six acari specimens were collected from the P. canariensis and they were identified as Ornithocheyletia hallae Smiley, 1970. CONCLUSION: It was detected that approximately one third of P. canariensis were infested with Ornithocheyletia hallae, and this acar species was recorded for the first time in Turkey in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".