Inhibitory interactions between 5-HT<sub>3</sub>and P2X channels in submucosal neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inhibitory interactions between 5-HT subtype 3 (5-HT(3)) and P2X receptors were characterized using whole cell recording techniques. Currents induced by 5-HT (I(5-HT)) and ATP (I(ATP)) were blocked by tropisetron (or ondansetron) and pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid, respectively. Currents induced by 5-HT + ATP (I(5-HT+ATP)) were only as large as the current induced by the most effective transmitter, revealing current occlusion. Occlusion was observed at membrane potentials of -60 and 0 mV (for inward currents), but it was not present at +40 mV (for outward currents). Kinetic and pharmacological properties of I(5-HT+ATP) indicate that they are carried through 5-HT(3) and P2X channels. Current occlusion occurred as fast as activation of I(5-HT) and I(ATP), was still present in the absence of Ca(2+) or Mg(2+), after adding staurosporine, genistein, K-252a, or N-ethylmaleimide to the pipette solution, after substituting ATP with proportional to, beta-methylene ATP or GTP with GTP-gamma-S in the pipette, and was observed at 35 degrees C, 23 degrees C, and 8 degrees C. These results are in agreement with a model that considers that 5-HT(3) and P2X channels are in functional clusters and that these channels might directly inhibit each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".