MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331867759 · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00054.2002

Inhibitory interactions between 5-HT<sub>3</sub>and P2X channels in submucosal neurons

2002· article· en· W2331867759 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Barajas‐López, Luis M. Montaño, Rosa Espinosa‐Luna

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiophysicsChemistryPipetteGTP'PPADSStaurosporineInhibitory postsynaptic potential5-HT receptorMembrane potentialReceptorSerotoninNeuroscienceBiochemistryPurinergic receptorBiologyEnzymeProtein kinase C

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inhibitory interactions between 5-HT subtype 3 (5-HT(3)) and P2X receptors were characterized using whole cell recording techniques. Currents induced by 5-HT (I(5-HT)) and ATP (I(ATP)) were blocked by tropisetron (or ondansetron) and pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid, respectively. Currents induced by 5-HT + ATP (I(5-HT+ATP)) were only as large as the current induced by the most effective transmitter, revealing current occlusion. Occlusion was observed at membrane potentials of -60 and 0 mV (for inward currents), but it was not present at +40 mV (for outward currents). Kinetic and pharmacological properties of I(5-HT+ATP) indicate that they are carried through 5-HT(3) and P2X channels. Current occlusion occurred as fast as activation of I(5-HT) and I(ATP), was still present in the absence of Ca(2+) or Mg(2+), after adding staurosporine, genistein, K-252a, or N-ethylmaleimide to the pipette solution, after substituting ATP with proportional to, beta-methylene ATP or GTP with GTP-gamma-S in the pipette, and was observed at 35 degrees C, 23 degrees C, and 8 degrees C. These results are in agreement with a model that considers that 5-HT(3) and P2X channels are in functional clusters and that these channels might directly inhibit each other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver PhysiologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207