MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2332032275 · doi:10.2118/174299-ms

Approximate Analytical Pressure Studies on Dual Porosity Reservoirs with Stress-sensitive Permeability

2015· article· en· W2332032275 on OpenAlexaff
Shuhua Wang, Mingxu Ma, Menglu Lin, Shengnan Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)MechanicsMaterials scienceModulusLaplace transformPorosityBoundary value problemDimensionless quantityPorous mediumPore water pressureGeotechnical engineeringGeologyComposite materialMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pressure transient analysis in porous media is commonly studied by assuming constant reservoir permeability over an entire range of formation pressure. Such assumption may not be applicable to natural fractured reservoirs where fracture permeability reduces during production. At present, there are still lacks of analytical pressure transient studies on dual porosity reservoirs with stress-sensitive permeability of the natural fractures. An approximate analytical model was proposed in this work to investigate the pressure transient in the naturally fractured reservoirs. It was assumed that only fracture permeability was stress-sensitive, which was a function of a permeability modulus and pressure differences. The permeability function was substituted into the cylindrical pressure diffusion equation to calculate pressure distribution in the reservoir. The obtained non-linear equations were linearized by a transformation equation, and then simplified by a zero-order perturbation technique. Finally, two inner boundary conditions and three outer boundary conditions were applied, and total 6 solutions in the Laplace space were presented. Calculated pressures from the models with and without stress-sensitive permeability were compared. It was found that the stress-sensitive solutions can be obtained by integrating the solutions from constant permeability models with the permeability modulus. For an infinite reservoir with constant flow rate boundary condition, if permeability modulus is 0.1, dimensionless pressure difference at the well bottomhole from the model with fracture permeability sensitivity is 48% higher than that of the constant fracture permeability model at later production time. Such difference can be as high as 122% if permeability modulus increases to 0.15. For locations further away from the wellbore (e.g., 12.7 m), the required pressure difference for the two models are close to each other. Finally, the exchange flow rates from reservoir matrix to natural fractures were calculated to identify different flow regimes. The proposed model not only provides an analytical and quantitative method to investigate the effects of fracture permeability-sensitivity on reservoir pressure distribution, it can also be applied to buildup analysis of well test data from stress-sensitive formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→