Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects Reveal Variations in Reactivity of Intermediates in the Formation of Protonated Carbonic Acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinetic evidence suggests that acid-catalyzed decarboxylation reactions of aromatic carboxylic acids can occur by a hydrolytic process that generates protonated carbonic acid (PCA) as the precursor of CO2. Measurements of reaction rates and carbon kinetic isotope effects (CKIE) for decarboxylation of isomeric sets of heterocyclic carboxylic acids in acidic solutions reveal that C-C cleavage to form PCA is rate-determining with significant variation in the magnitude of the observed CKIE (1.018-1.043). Larger values are associated with the more reactive member in each isomeric pair. This variation is consistent with stepwise mechanisms in which C-C cleavage is competitive with C-O cleavage, leading to reversion to the protonated reactant to varying degrees with an invariant intrinsic CKIE for C-C cleavage. Thus, the relative barriers to reversion and formation of PCA control the magnitude of the observed CKIE in a predictable manner that correlates with reactivity. Application of the proposed overall mechanism reveals that carboxylation reactions in acidic solutions will proceed by way of initial formation of PCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".