Biomechanical Evaluation of Interfragmentary Compression At Tibia Plateau Fractures In Vitro Using Different Fixation Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliable osteosynthesis of intraarticular fractures depends on lasting interfragmentary compression. Its amount differs in the applied fixation method. The interfragmentary compression of cancellous and cortical lag screws and angle stable locking plates was quantified in an osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic synthetic human bone model.A split fracture of the lateral tibia plateau (AO/OTA type 41-B1.1) was mimicked by an osteotomy in right adult synthetic human tibiae with hard or soft cancellous bone. Specimens were fixed with either two 6.5 mm cancellous, four 3.5 mm cortical lag screws, or 3.5 mm LCP proximal lateral tibia plate preliminary compresed by a reduction clamp (n = 5 per group). A pressure sensor film was used to register the interfragmentary compression. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc correction was performed for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).Interfragmentary compression under reduction clamp was 0.59 ± 0.12 MPa in the non-osteoporotic and 0.55 ± 0.14 MPa in the osteoporotic group. The locking plate itself maintained the compression in non-osteoporotic (0.53 ± 0.11 MPa) and osteoporotic bone (0.50 ± 0.14 MPa). Four 3.5 mm cortical lag screws provided a compression of 1.69 ± 0.65 MPa in non-osteoporotic bone, being not significantly different to the osteoporotic bone group (1.43 ± 0.47 MPa, P = 1.0). Two 6.5 mm cancellous lag screws showed a significantly higher compression in non-osteoporotic (2.1 ± 0.59 MPa) compared to osteoporotic (0.77 ± 0.21 MPa, P < 0.01) bone.Angle stable locking plates maintained the compression preliminarily applied by a reduction clamp. Two 6.5 mm cancellous lag screws are especially suited for non-osteoporotic bone, whereas four 3.5 mm cortical screws exhibited comparable compression in both bone qualities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".