Giovanni Ciappelli . Fisco e società a Firenze nel Rinascimento . (Studi e testi del Rinascimento europeo, number 36.) Rome : Edizioni di storia e letteratura . 2009 . Pp. viii, 297. €38.00.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The public finances of late medieval Florence are better documented than those of any other medieval European state. As Giovanni Ciappelli remarks in this collection of his essays on Florentine political economy, the records of the republic's funded debt, the monte comune, preserved in the Florentine state archive alone comprise some 4000 registers. But they represent only part of the evidence: Anthony Molho and Elio Conti were able to produce their pioneering studies without access to the monte archive, which was long closed for want of an inventory. It was Molho's initial survey of the deposit in 1971–1972 that first allowed scholars to navigate this ocean of data, and Ciappelli himself is collaborating on a fresh inventory. As the essays in this volume confirm, the debt dominated virtually every aspect of Florentine political economy from at least the beginning of the fifteenth century to the end of the republican period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".