MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332174707 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.66.356

Introduction of the Power Offer Business through the Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program in Canada

2012· article· en· W2332174707 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hisashi Ochiai

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgy and Material Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation (genetics)Pulp (tooth)BusinessEngineeringPulp and paper industryManufacturing engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

カナダの紙パルプ産業は2005年~2009年にわたってカナダドル高による為替差損,北米の紙需要低下などから非常に苦しい状況に陥っていた。カナダ政府は危機的状況にある紙パルプ企業を救済,さらに環境エネルギー分野への転換を促進するために,2009年6月に投資助成プログラムPulp and Paper Green Transformation Program(GTP)を発表した。このプログラムではパルプ工場の黒液燃焼量1L当りC$0.16の助成を受けることができる。助成金総額はC$10億(約870億円)であり,カナダ国内24社38工場が対象である。大昭和丸紅インターナショナル社が所有するアルバータ州ピースリバー工場とブリティッシュコロンビア州カリブー工場もその対象となった。各社への助成条件として,1)エネルギー効率改善2)再生可能エネルギー増産3)環境に有益のいずれかに該当する設備投資への助成金使用が指示されており,当社はこのGTPによる助成金を活用して2012年から本格的に売電事業に参入することになった。本稿ではカナダの紙パルプ事情を踏まえ,GTP制度の概要ついて紹介すると共に,当社2工場の電力事情及び売電事業計画をあわせて述べる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNALSame topicMetallurgy and Material ScienceFrench-language works237,207