Plasma Volume and Flight Duration Effects on Post-Spaceflight Soluble Adhesion Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the effects of plasma volume (PV) changes and flight duration on circulating soluble adhesion markers (sP-selection, sE-selection, and sICAM-1). METHODS: Study participants were 22 astronauts (2 women). Missions ranged from 5 to 16 d. Astronauts were split into two groups: those who spent less than 8 d in space and those who spent more than 8 d in space. Soluble adhesion markers and PV were assessed 10 d prelaunch, immediately after landing, and 2-4 d postflight. RESULTS: Compared to prelaunch, PV significantly decreased by 4.9% after landing and increased by 9.9% 2-4 d postflight. After landing, sICAM-1 decreased (233.15 vs. 226.78 ng · ml⁻¹) and remained lowered 2-4 d after landing (223.25 ng · ml⁻¹). Adjusting for PV changes, sICAM-1 upon landing was less than prelaunch (218.23 ng · ml⁻¹), but became greater 2-4 d postflight (250.30 ng · ml⁻¹). From prelaunch to landing, sE-selection decreased significantly (30.25 vs. 28.51 ng · ml⁻¹) and returned to prelaunch levels 2-4 d postflight (30.10 ng · ml⁻¹). Adjusting for PV changes, sE-selection was significantly greater 2-4 d postflight (33.48 ng · ml⁻¹) compared to prelaunch. In those who spent less than 8 d in space only, sP-selection increased from prelaunch levels to landing day (31.66 vs. 48.06 ng · ml⁻¹), with and without adjustment for PV changes. Flight duration did not influence PV, sICAM-1, or sE-selection. DISCUSSION: Spaceflight leads to an internal environment that decreases PV during flight but rebounds after flight, leading to a dilution of sICAM-1 and sE-selection, but does not appear to affect sP-selection. Flight duration only affected sP-selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".