MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332217343 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov061.77

MB-01 * NOTCH1 PROMOTES MYC MEDULLOBLASTOMA METASTASIS, INITIATION AND MAINTENANCE

2015· article· en· W2332217343 on OpenAlexaff
Suzana Assad Kahn, Ryo Nitta, Kan Wang, Sharareh Gholamin, Tej D. Azad, M. Zhang, Y.-J. Cho, Michael D. Taylor, Siddhartha S. Mitra, Irving L. Weissman, Samuel Cheshier

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaCancer researchFlow cytometryMetastasisPopulationCellDownregulation and upregulationPrimary tumorCerebrospinal fluidWestern blotMedicineCancer stem cellCell cultureBiologyCancerPathologyOncologyInternal medicineImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant brain tumor that originates in the cerebellum in children and spreads via the cerebrospinal fluid to the leptomeningeal spaces of the brain and spinal cord. MB is stratified into four distinct groups, according to genetic and clinical features, and patients from group 3 (also known as c-Myc-amplified) have the highest risk of developing metastatic disease and, consequently, poor prognosis. Treatment protocols involve surgery, craniospinal radiation, and high-dose chemotherapy, which frequently cause disabling neurotoxic effects in long-term survivors. We used MB cell lines and primary cells isolated from patients from the c-Myc-amplified group as tools to understand the cellular determinants of leptomeningeal dissemination. Cells isolated from metastatic tumors express 10 times more NICD1 (Notch1 Intracellular Domain), the active form of Notch1, than cells isolated from primary sites (as quantified by western blot and imunohistochemistry), what implies the upregulation of Notch1 signaling pathway in MB metastasis. Moreover, flow cytometry analyses revealed that the cells isolated from metastatic sites express higher levels of full-length Notch1 when compared to cells from primary sites. These differences occur because of the enrichment in the cancer stem cell population at the metastatic sites, as we observed that MB cells isolated from metastatic tumors exhibit higher self-renewal potential than cells from primary tumor sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207