MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332301040 · doi:10.4172/2161-1459.1000143

Dual-acting 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) Prodrugs: Cell Death Induced by 3’-O-retinoyl-5-fluoro-2’-deoxyuridine and 5’-O-[bis(2,2,2,-trichloroethyl) phosphoryl-3’-O-butanoyl]-5-fluoro-2’-deoxyuridine

2013· article· en· W2332301040 on OpenAlexafffund
Edward E. Knaus

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Pharmacology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProdrugDeoxyuridinePharmacologyChemistryStereochemistryMedicineBiochemistryDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several novel 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) prodrugs with postulated dual mechanisms of anticancer activity based on nucleoside cytotoxicity and cell differentiation induced by retinoic acid/butyric acid have been reported. The O-retinoyl-and O-butanoyl-esters of FUdR were reported to be more potent and had broader anticancer spectra than either FUdR or 5-fluorouracil (FU) against a bank of human cancer cell lines. The induction of necrosis or apoptosis in HL-60 cells by 3'-O-retinoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (RFUdR) and the masked butyryl ester nucleotide, 5'-O-bis(trichloroethyl)phosphoryl-3'-O-butanoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (BTCEP-BFUdR), is now reported. Apoptosis was the major pathway of HL-60 cell death caused by RFUdR (1 10 -5 M), independent of the exposure time. In contrast, apoptosis and necrosis were equally evident after exposure to BTCEP-BFUdR (1 10 -5 M) for 48 h, which is similar to the effect of FUdR. These in vitro data support a cytotoxicity model in which release of the nucleoside (FUdR) and the cell differentiator (all-trans retinoic acid, RA or butyrate, NaBu) from the respective prodrugs act synergistically to induce greater cell killing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental PharmacologySame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207