MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332363572 · doi:10.1021/jp408490d

Fluorescence Lifetimes of the Ã<sup>1</sup>Π<sub>u</sub> State of C<sub>3</sub>

2013· article· en· W2332363572 on OpenAlexaff
Yi-Jen Wang, Chiao-Wei Chen, Liuzhu Zhou, A. J. Merer, Yen‐Chu Hsu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAcademia SinicaNational Science Council
KeywordsFluorescenceAtomic physicsState (computer science)PhysicsChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fluorescence lifetimes of 115 vibrational levels of the Ã1Π(u) state of C3 have been measured under supersonic molecular beam conditions. Of these, ninety-one are Π(u) vibronic levels, for which the lifetimes lie in the range 190-700 ns. The lifetimes of those Π(u) levels where only the bending vibration is excited lie in the range 190-235 ns. There is very little variation with bending quantum number, and the lifetimes of the two orbital components of the 1Π(u) state are essentially the same. When ν1 and ν3 are excited, the lifetimes become longer and/or reach a maximum for levels with v1 + v3 ~ 4. Excitation of the bending vibration in addition to the stretching vibrations shortens the lifetime slightly. Several of the levels show double-exponential decays. Another 23 levels, of Σ(u)+ vibronic symmetry, mostly have lifetimes that are longer than 300 ns. Interaction with nearby "dark" electronic states, such as B1Σ(u)-, B'1Δ(u), C1Π(g), and b3Π(g), is proposed to account for the observed lifetime lengthening. A particularly clear instance of such an interaction is the long lifetime (914 ns) of a perturbing Σ(u)+ level at 30,181 cm(-1), which is confirmed as belonging to the perturbing B'1Δ(u) state. A single level of Δ(u) symmetry at 29,170 cm(-1), which perturbs one of the Π(u) levels, is shown to belong to the à state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207