Introduction of an Enhanced Binding of Reduced Graphene Oxide to Polyurethane Sponge for Oil Absorption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was covalently bound onto the surface of polyurethane (PU) sponge using two different coupling agents: (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane and titanium(IV)(triethanolaminato)isopropoxide. The coupling agents were introduced before and after reduction of graphene oxide to compare the impact of the sequence on the absorbance capacities. The sponges were evaluated based on hydrophobicity and pump oil absorbance capacities. The structure and properties of the sponges were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Results revealed that reacting the graphene oxide PU sponge with the coupling agent titanium(IV)(triethanolaminato)isopropoxide prior to reduction significantly improved oil absorbance. This was due to the improved binding of reduced graphene oxide to the polyurethane framework. The resulting improved rGO-coated PU sponge is a highly efficient and reusable sorbent material and is a promising alternative for oil–water separation applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".