MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PMO-226 Differing phenotype in elderly IBD; should Montreal include an A4 category

2012· article· en· W2332558489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A A McNicol, Nicholas A. Kennedy, Jack Satsangi, Ian Arnott

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseAge groupsPopulationClinical phenotypeInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseasePediatricsYoung adultPhenotypeDemographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The phenotype of elderly-onset IBD is poorly described and knowledge lags behind that of other age-groups. While not the dominant age-group in the disease population, those diagnosed over 60 will compose a larger proportion it as the general population ages over the next decade. The Montreal classification for IBD stratifies related to age into three categories, 40(A3) the study aims to ascertain if disease phenotype varies between those aged 40–59 and those >60 with possibility of an A4 group becoming viable if variance is noted. Methods 1957 patients with IBD were identified using the IBD database at the Western General Hospital. We selected all those UC (n=306) and CD (n=135) diagnosed at age 40 and over (A3) and subdivided the group in to those over and under 60. The diagnosis adhered to the criteria of Lennard-Jones and IBD was categorised according to the Montréal classification. Data collected included diagnosis, age at diagnosis, disease distribution, disease behaviour and smoking history. Follow-up were available for 5 years following diagnosis. Analysis of the groups was undertaken using χ 2 and Fishers exact test. Results Gender of CD patients in the different age groups (40–59; M/F=53/96. >60; M/F=10/49 p=0.0115) illustrated a higher proportion of women in the >60 group. CD patients who were diagnosed over the age of 60 had more isolated colonic disease at diagnosis. (L2; 40–59 N=28/77, >60 N=37/58, p=0.0032 L3; 40–59 N=15/77, >60 N=2/58 p=0.0073). By 5 years of follow-up these differences were no longer significant. There was do difference in disease behaviour or smoking history. UC patients had more left sided disease and less distal disease at diagnosis (E1; 40–59 N=70/204, >60 N=20/102, p=0.0079 E2; 40–59 N=88/204, >60 N=57/102 p=0.039). Smoking history showed a greater proportion of former smokers in the >60 group (40–59 N=108/216, >60 N=70/107 p=0.0058). Conclusion Disease phenotype at Dx in both UC and Crohn's differs in the over-60s at diagnosis but normalises to that of the A3 population at follow-up. This data suggests that the introduction of an additional Montreal age classification, A4, would be clinically meaningful. Further analysis will demonstrate whether response to treatment differs in this age group. Competing interests None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207