MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332576082 · doi:10.12681/eoaesperia.81

ΕΔΑΦΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΕΚΔΙΚΗΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΒΕΝΕΤΙΑΣ ΣΤΗ Ν. ΜΕΣΣΗΝΙΑ (Α' ΜΙΣΟ ΤΟΥ 15ΟΥ ΑΙΩΝΑ). ΜΕ ΑΦΟΡΜΗ ΑΝΕΚΔΟΤΟ ΑΡΓΥΡΟΒΟΥΛΛΟ ΤΟΥ ΘΩΜΑ ΠΑΛΑΙΟΛΟΓΟΥ

2007· article· en· W2332576082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Κωνσταντίνα Δ. Παπακοσμα

Bibliographic record

VenueEoa kai Esperia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProclamationSubject (documents)Ancient historyState (computer science)HistoryClassicsHumanitiesArtLawLibrary sciencePolitical scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The present paper deals with Venice's long and strenuous diplomaticefforts during the first half of the 15th century to extend its rule over theMessenian hinterland, by acquiring certain strongholds subject to theprincipality of Achaea, such as Navarino, Grisi, Maniatochori (Manticuor),Cosmina and Lachanada (Canada/La Cannata).</p><p>Special emphasis is put on the Venetian claim for two of them, Grisi andManiatochori, in southern Messenia. Two, unpublished so far, documents,conserved in Venice's State Archives, namely a) a copy of an argyrovullon ofthe Greek despot of Morea Thomas Palaeologos, issued in July 1454 and b)another one of a public proclamation made by the Venetian castellan ofModon, Alexandra Marcello, later in the same year, cast new light on theexact time and the conditions, under which Venice succeeded in takingpossession of the two above-mentioned Messenian places. According to thetwo documents, the Venetian occupation of Grisi and Maniatochori wasofficially established in 1426 by a privilegio of Centurione II Zaccaria andlasted until 1450, when the two villages were captured by ThomasPalaeologos. Eventually, in 1454 they were restored to Venice by theargyrovullon of the Greek despot.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEoa kai EsperiaSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207