MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2332642772 · doi:10.1021/jp200260e

Effects of Cu Ions and Explicit Water Molecules on the Copper Binding Domain of Amyloid Precursor Protein APP(131–189): A Molecular Dynamics Study

2011· article· en· W2332642772 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiang Wang, Nick Henry Werstiuk, James R. Kramer, Russell A. Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsCopperMolecular dynamicsChemistryMoleculeAmyloid precursor proteinDomain (mathematical analysis)IonBiophysicsComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryBiologyInternal medicineAlzheimer's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a cell-surface trans-membrane glycoprotein that appears to play an important role in in vivo Cu ion homeostasis. This protein includes a copper-binding-domain (CuBD) fragment consisting of residues 124-189, of which His147, His151, Tyr168, and possibly Met170 comprise the explicit Cu-binding site (CuBS). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are carried out on Cu-free and Cu-bound APP models, based on crystal structures including residues 131-189 obtained from the Protein Data Bank, to confirm the site of Cu-ion binding and to elucidate the effects of the oxidation state of the Cu ions (default GROMACS parameters modeled only the electrostatic binding to the Cu ions at the CuBS) and explicit water molecules on the conformational properties of the 131-189 residue portion of the CuBD. MD trajectory analysis demonstrated a conformational change of Met170. The sulfur atom of Met170 moves closer to the Cu(II) ion and away from Cu(I), and this change may play an important role in the reduction of Cu(II) and the release of Cu(I). Two explicit water molecules were included in the MD simulations. These water molecules that bind strongly to the Cu ions via their lone pair electrons result in a significant modification of the binding interactions with the other residues at the CuBS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→