MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332676550 · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600411

Positron Emission Tomography Quantification of [ <sup>11</sup> C]-(+)-PHNO Binding in the Human Brain

2006· article· en· W2332676550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPutamenGlobus pallidusPositron emission tomographyRadioligandNuclear medicineStriatumCerebellumBinding potentialHuman brainChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineInternal medicineBasal gangliaDopamineBiologyPhysicsReceptorNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetic modeling of [11C]-(+)-PHNO binding to the dopamine D2/3 receptors in six human volunteers using positron emission tomography (PET) is described. [11C]-(+)-PHNO is the first agonist radioligand for the D2/3 in humans and as expected showed high uptake in caudate, putamen, globus pallidus (GP) and ventral striatum, and low uptake in cerebellum. A two-tissue compartment model (2CM) with four parameters was necessary to adequately fit time-activity data in all regions. Although a 2CM provided an excellent estimation of total distribution volumes, which were highly correlated with those obtained with the invasive Logan approach, it provided a poor identification of the k3/k4 ratios. Coupling K1/k2 between brain regions (Method C) or fixing K1/k2 to the value obtained in cerebellum (Method D) enabled more stable estimates of k3/k4 as compared with an unconstrained 2CM. The k3/k4 obtained with Method D ranged from 0.12+/-0.03 in cerebellum to 3.93+/-0.77 in GP and were similar to those obtained when coupling K1/k2. Binding potentials (BPs) obtained using the simplified reference tissue model (BP(SRTM)) ranged from 2.08+/-0.34 in caudate to 3.55+/-0.78 in GP and were highly correlated with k3/k4 estimates obtained with Method D (r=0.98). However, BP(SRTM) were 11%+/-5% lower than values obtained with Method D. BPs derived using the noninvasive Logan approach were slightly lower but not significantly different than BP(SRTM). This study demonstrates that [11C]-(+)-PHNO can be used for the quantitative measurement of D2/3 densities and should enable further studies of potential D2/3 dysregulation in several important psychiatric and neurologic illnesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it