MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332709574 · doi:10.1109/twc.2016.2547378

Multimedia Content Delivery in Millimeter Wave Home Networks

2016· article· en· W2332709574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationBandwidth (computing)HeuristicConvex optimizationWirelessMathematical optimizationOptimization problemWireless networkInteger programmingComputer networkDistributed computingAlgorithmTelecommunicationsRegular polygonArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millimeter wave (mm-wave) communication is a promising technology for short-range communications and high-speed services. It provides potential solutions for multimedia content delivery in home networks. However, approaches for resource allocation in traditional wireless networks may not be efficient for multimedia data transmissions in mm-wave networks. This is due to the very wide bandwidth and highly directional transmissions, which bring challenges as well as opportunities to the resource allocation of mm-wave transmissions. In this paper, we first characterize different usage scenarios of multimedia content delivery by introducing a set of utility functions. We then formulate a joint power and channel allocation problem based on a network utility maximization framework, which captures the spatial and frequency reuse of mm-wave communications. The formulated problem is a non-convex mixed integer programming (MIP) problem. We reformulate the problem into a convex MIP problem and propose a resource allocation algorithm based on outer approximation (OA) method. We further develop an efficient heuristic algorithm, which has a lower complexity than the OA based algorithm. Simulation results present the tradeoffs between the OA based and heuristic algorithms for different scenarios and show that our proposed algorithms substantially outperform recently proposed schemes in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it