West Nile Virus Infection in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Series and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is a rapidly spreading infectious disease in North America. Critical care issues related to WNV are not well described. OBJECTIVES: Three cases of severe WNV meningoencephalitis with flaccid paralysis are reported and relevant critical care issues are highlighted. METHODS: Case series and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Three patients with WNV meningoencephalitis and flaccid paralysis were admitted to the authors' academic, tertiary-care intensive care unit (ICU) in the late summer of 2002. All three patients were middle-aged or elderly and presented with a febrile illness that preceded or coincided with their neurological symptoms. Confirmation of WNV infection was problematic because each patient had at least one initial negative serum serology test. Radiological testing yielded nonspecific results. Serial electroencephalograms were consistent with severe toxic metabolic encephalopathy in all cases. All patients had a severe, diffuse axonal polyneuropathy demonstrated by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Prolonged mechanical ventilation resulted in ICU lengths of stay of 44 to 118 days. At one point, 21% of the ICU beds were dedicated for these patients. All three patients died in hospital - two following the withdrawal of life support. One patient demonstrated resolving encephalitis and was discharged from the ICU after a 118-day ICU stay, but later died in a step-down unit. CONCLUSIONS: The management of WNV-related critical illness creates challenges in making a timely and accurate diagnosis, and predicting patient morbidity and mortality. As a consequence, end-of-life discussions with families are especially difficult. The prolonged ICU length of stay and growing incidence of this disease may challenge limited critical care resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".