MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332809561 · doi:10.1177/1071100713500489

Lateral Talar Station

2013· article· en· W2332809561 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Veljkovic, Adam Norton, Peter Salat, Charles L. Saltzman, John E. Femino, Phinit Phisitkul, Annunziato Amendola

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkleSagittal planeRadiographyCohortOrthodonticsWeight-bearingHeelSurgeryRadiologyAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The sagittal relationship of the talus to the tibial shaft can prove invaluable to the orthopedist in understanding and effectively treating ankle pathologies such as ligamentous laxity and ankle arthritis. Any useful radiographic analysis tool to assess the lateral position of the talus must be employable reliably in the clinical setting. Previously published measurements to assess the lateral translational relationship of the talus relative to the tibial axis may not be available in the clinical setting or may be subject to significant inaccuracies. We have defined a sagittal talar position measurement (lateral talar station; LTS), which we postulated could be used reproducibly on clinical radiographs by the orthopedist to define the position of the talus as it relates to the anatomic tibial axis. In addition, we defined the normal range of the LTS measurement. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients (121 ankles, 104 patients) who presented to our clinic with foot pain between 2005 and 2011 was evaluated for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria included patients with ankle trauma, instability, prior ankle surgery, or radiographic evidence of ankle osteoarthrosis. The final cohort consisted of 82 ankles. The LTS was measured digitally for each subject on weight-bearing lateral ankle radiographs by 3 observers. The mean LTS and standard deviation was determined for the entire cohort. In addition, as a means of validating our methodology, we performed an assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in terms of the LTS measurements. RESULTS: The LTS measurements for the entire cohort fit a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 1.17 mm (SD = 0.9893 mm). Interobserver intraclass coefficients for 2 observers (medical student and radiologist) and intraobserver intraclass coefficients for 1 reader (orthopaedic surgeon) indicated excellent reliability, being above 0.9. CONCLUSION: The LTS was a reliable measure that could be used on weight-bearing lateral ankle radiographs to define sagittal position of the talus in a clinical setting. The normal distribution for the LTS was described in our study population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle InternationalSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207