MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332860973 · doi:10.1021/ja513258j

Synthesis and Tunability of Highly Electron-Accepting, N-Benzylated “Phosphaviologens”

2015· article· en· W2332860973 on OpenAlexafffund
Monika Stolar, Javier Borau‐Garcia, Mark Toonen, Thomas Baumgartner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsChemistryViologenElectrochromismSubstituentElectron acceptorTrifluoromethanesulfonateBipyridineCombinatorial chemistryPhotochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCrystal structureCatalysisPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a structure-property study on phosphoryl-bridged viologen analogues with a remarkably low reduction threshold. Utilizing different benzyl groups for N-quaternization, we were able to confirm the p-benzyl substituent effect on the electronic tunability of the system while maintaining the characteristic chromic response of viologens with two fully reversible one-electron reductions. Due to the considerably increased electron-acceptor properties of the phosphoryl-bridged bipyridine precursor, N-benzylation was found to be very challenging and required the development of new synthetic strategies toward the target viologen species. This study also introduces a new and convenient way for the anion exchange of viologen systems by utilizing methyl triflate. Finally, the practical utility of the new species was verified in simplified proof-of-concept electrochromic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations147
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207