MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332935715 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b00070

Reactivity and Stereoselectivity of 6π and Nazarov Electrocyclizations of Bridged Bicyclic Trienes and Divinyl Ketones

2015· article· en· W2332935715 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashay Patel, F. G. West, K. N. Houk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of California, Los Angeles
KeywordsStereoselectivityReactivity (psychology)Bicyclic moleculeChemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 6π electrocyclizations and Nazarov cyclizations of a series of bridged bicyclic substrates were modeled with the M06-2X density functional and the def2-TZVPP basis set, and the factors responsible for the reactivities of these substrates and the stereoselectivities of their ring closures were identified. The ring closures of these bridged bicyclic trienes are up to a million-fold faster (ΔΔG(⧧) = 10 kcal mol(-1)) than that of 1,3,5-hexatriene, despite the absence of any activating functional groups. Three effects, preorganization, predistortion, and a CH π interaction, are responsible for this sizable difference in reactivity. Stereoselectivity is partially controlled by torsional effects, but for highly exo selective electrocyclizations, it is reinforced by a second effect (either a CH π interaction or a steric clash). The absence of this second effect in the ring closures of several divinyl ketones explains the reduced selectivity of these ring closures. In one case, a divinyl ketone (ketone 6) undergoes Nazarov cyclization to yield the endo product preferentially. For this example, through-space interaction of a nonconjugated alkene with the divinyl ketone π system in the endo transition state and a steric effect override the intrinsic exo selectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicAsymmetric Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207