MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332996080 · doi:10.1061/9780784479117.205

Cyclic Performance of a Piston Based Self-Centering Bracing System

2015· article· en· W2332996080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBracingStructural engineeringBraceBucklingStiffnessFinite element methodDeformation (meteorology)Compression (physics)Piston (optics)HysteresisUltimate tensile strengthEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major difficulties faced with traditional structural bracing systems against seismic loading include compression buckling and permanent residual deformation under seismic loading. Once buckling occurs, the strength and stiffness of a brace gets significantly reduced and the stiffness degrades rapidly in subsequent load cycles. A significant number of researches have been conducted in resolving this issue and various ideas have been proposed and developed for the industry, e.g. buckling restrained brace, cast steel yielding fuse, SCED, MANSIDE, and RHDB braces, etc. Unfortunately, most of these solutions are expensive and complicated to construct. Authors here have proposed a novel approach in addressing this issue using a modification of a device commonly seen in mechanical systems, which is a cylinder-piston assembly. In this system, stiffness and re-centering are contributed by shape memory alloy ties. This study investigates the behavior of this innovative Piston Based Self-Centering (PBSC) bracing system in finite element environment. Utilizing this assembly, a brace member is able to carry large magnitude of tensile and compression loading without buckling. Furthermore, this brace is able to re-center after large nonlinear deformation. This paper presents the results of the analytical investigation carried out in ABAQUS software using finite element method. The load deformation hysteresis was determined and a flag shaped hysteresis was achieved, which indicates good re-centering capability of the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it