G Protein–Coupled Receptor Signaling in Cardiac Nuclear Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play key physiological roles and represent a significant target for drug development. However, historically, drugs were developed with the understanding that GPCRs as a therapeutic target exist solely on cell surface membranes. More recently, GPCRs have been detected on intracellular membranes, including the nuclear membrane, and the concept that intracellular GPCRs are functional is become more widely accepted. Nuclear GPCRs couple to effectors and regulate signaling pathways, analogous to their counterparts at the cell surface, but may serve distinct biological roles. Hence, the physiological responses mediated by GPCR ligands, or pharmacological agents, result from the integration of their actions at extracellular and intracellular receptors. The net effect depends on the ability of a given ligand or drug to access intracellular receptors, as dictated by its structure, lipophilic properties, and affinity for nuclear receptors. This review will discuss angiotensin II, endothelin, and β-adrenergic receptors located on the nuclear envelope in cardiac cells in terms of their origin, activation, and role in cardiovascular function and pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".