MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2333076081 · doi:10.5194/acpd-13-13685-2013

Evaluating evidence for Cl sources and oxidation chemistry in a coastal, urban environment

2013· article· en· W2333076081 on OpenAlexafffund
Cora J. Young, R. A. Washenfelder, P. M. Edwards, D. D. Parrish, J. B. Gilman, W. C. Kuster, L. H. Mielke, Hans D. Osthoff, Catalina Tsai, O. Pikelnaya, J. Stutz, Patrick R. Veres, J. M. Roberts, Stephen M. Griffith, Sébastien Dusanter, P. S. Stevens, James Flynn, N. Grossberg, B. L. Lefer, J. S. Holloway, Jeff Peischl, Thomas B. Ryerson, E. Atlas, D. R. Blake, Steven S. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Air Resources Board
KeywordsChemistryOzoneEnvironmental chemistryNOxButaneChlorinePrimary (astronomy)Box modelAtmospheric chemistryPhotochemistryMeteorologyCatalysisCombustionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The role of chlorine atoms (Cl) in atmospheric oxidation was traditionally thought to be limited to the marine boundary layer, where they are produced through heterogeneous reactions involving sea salt. However, recent observation of photolytic Cl precursors (ClNO2 and Cl2) formed from anthropogenic pollution has expanded the potential importance of Cl to include coastal and continental urban areas. Measurements of ClNO2 in Los Angeles during CalNex showed it to be an important primary (first generation) radical source. Ratios of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been proposed as a sensitive method to quantify Cl oxidation, but have shown little evidence for a significant role of Cl outside of the Arctic. We used a box model with the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.2) chemistry scheme, constrained by observations in Los Angeles, to examine the Cl-sensitivity of the most commonly used VOC ratios (i-butane, n-butane, and propane) as a function of NOx and secondary radical production. Model results indicated these and faster reacting VOC tracer ratios could not detect the influence of Cl unless the sustained ratio of OH to Cl was below 200. However, the model results also show that secondary (second generation) OH production resulting from Cl oxidation of VOCs is strongly influenced by NOx, and that this effect can obscure the importance of Cl as a primary oxidant. Calculated concentrations of Cl showed a maximum in mid-morning due to a photolytic source from ClNO2 and loss primarily to reactions with VOCs. The OH to Cl ratio was below 200 for approximately three hours in the morning, but Cl oxidation was not evident from the measured ratios of VOCs. Instead, model simulations show that secondary OH production causes VOC ratios to follow the values expected for OH oxidation despite the significant input of primary Cl from ClNO2 photolysis in the morning. Despite the prevalence of secondary OH as an oxidant in Los Angeles, Cl may play an important role in tropospheric chemistry. The reactivity of Cl in Los Angeles during CalNex was more than an order of magnitude larger than that of OH. In addition, because of its reactivity toward different classes of VOCs and its greater propensity to participate in chain propagation rather than sink reactions, Cl atoms have a different impact on regional atmospheric oxidation than do OH radicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→