PLANETARY ANALOG STUDIES AND SIMULATIONS: MATERIALS, TERRAINS, MORPHOLOGIES, PROCESSES: CONCISE ATLAS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM (9) EÖTVÖS UNIVERSITY, HUNGARY. Gy. Hudoba 1 , S.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Transfer of ideas from terrestrial works to planetary ones can be intensified by analog methods. Among others, analog studies of comparative planetary geology play a key role in planetary science education. The whole system of terrestrial geology knowledge can be transformed to other planetary conditions if we compare and fit them to the conditions on the other planet. Analog site field works for Apollo astronauts: Various analog planetary geology studies were organized first for astronauts preparing to the lunar landing in the Apollo Era. American desert and mountainous regions were visited by them in the Grand Canyon and Arizona (Meteor crater) and other sites. Recently the Mars is the main object for manned and robotic research. Mars analog terrains can be found in several places on the Earth. Haughton crater in Devon Island, Canada and Antarctic terrains are cold desert places, where impact processes (Haughton crater) and extremely cold conditions (both places) are present. For analog sites with Martian volcanism together with ice, glaciers, ice-lava interactions the islands of Iceland and Svalbard seem excellent places.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".