Increased Frequency of Hand Osteoarthritis in Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrome Compared with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In daily practice, we noticed that hand osteoarthritis (OA) was commonly associated with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS). Therefore, we aimed to investigate its prevalence in patients with pSS in a controlled study. METHODS: The study included patients with pSS and controls with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Standard hand/wrist radiographs were obtained and classified according to the Kellgren-Lawrence system. "Erosive hand OA" was defined according to the Verbruggen-Veys classification. RESULTS: There were 114 patients with pSS (110 women, 51.0 yrs) and 34 patients with SLE (33 women, 42.4 yrs). Among 114 patients with pSS, 42.7% had radiographic, 30.3% symptomatic, and 16.0% erosive hand OA. The prevalences of radiographic (45.5%) and erosive hand OA (14.4%) in 90 patients with pSS with age- and sex-matched patients with SLE were significantly higher than those in patients with SLE (14.7% and 0.0%, p = 0.007 and p = 0.012, respectively). Interobserver reliabilities for diagnosing radiographic and erosive OA were found to be good (ĸ = 0.780 and ĸ = 0.788, respectively). Intraobserver reliabilities for diagnosing radiographic and erosive OA were also good (ĸ = 0.784 and ĸ = 0.825 for FO, and ĸ = 0.722 and ĸ = 0.800 for AB, respectively). The frequency of hand OA in patients with pSS was found to be increased with increasing age (r = 0.513). The mean age of those with erosive hand OA was significantly higher than those without erosive OA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pSS, conversely to SLE, is more frequently associated with hand OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".