A STUDY ON THE ROLES OF A THIRD PARTY IN THE GANGES RIVER WATER CONFLICT BETWEEN BANGLADHS AND INDIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
インドとバングラデシュはインド領ファラッカ堰におけるガンジス河の水配分問題に関して, 長い間コンフリクトをくりひろげてきた. 当事者間のみでの交渉でコンフリクト状態が膠着した場合, Third Partyの介入によるコンフリクトの調整が有効な方策として考えられる. 本研究では, まず, ゲーム理論を基礎としたGMCR IIの枠組みでThird Partyの役割に関して分類と定義を行い, Third Partyによるコンフリクト・マネジメントへのアプローチを示す. そして, 本アプローチをインド・バングラデシュのコンフリクトに適用し, Third Partyの調整過程とその効果を分析する. 分析の結果, Third Partyの介入によりインド・バングラデシュ間に相互信頼が形成され, 現実のコンフリクトでは実現困難なコンフリクト改善状況が均衡解として実現され得ることが示される.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".