Excitonic complexes in natural InAs/GaAs quantum dots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantum confinement in a typical quantum dot (QD) is determined primarily by the nanosystem's dimensions and average composition. We demonstrate, however, that excitonic properties of natural QDs formed in the InAs/GaAs wetting layer are governed predominantly by effects of random fluctuations of the lattice composition. It is shown that the biexciton binding energy is a very sensitive function of the lattice randomness with a nearly flat dependence on the exciton energy. The large variation in different random realizations of a QD structure is shown to lead in some cases to the reversal of the order of excitonic lines. Results of theoretical calculations correspond to statistical properties of neutral excitons and biexcitons as well as trions confined to single natural QDs studied in our microspectroscopic measurements. We observe substantial variation of the biexciton and trion binding energies as well as a correlation of the trion and the biexciton energies. The transition from the negative to the positive binding energy of the trion is also observed, which strongly supports the attribution of the observed trion to the positively charged exciton.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it