Applications of Time Dependent and Time Independent Density Functional Theory to the First π to π* Transition in Cyanine Dyes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first π → π* transition in a number of cyanine dyes was studied using both time dependent and time independent density functional methods using a coupled cluster (CC2) method as the benchmark scheme. On the basis of 10 different functionals, it was concluded that adiabatic time dependent density functional theory (ATDDFT) almost independently of the functional gives rise to a singlet-triplet separation that is too large by up to 1 eV, leading to too high singlet energies and too low triplet energies. This trend is even clearer when the Tamm-Dancoff (TD) approximation is introduced and can in ATDDFT/TD be traced back to the representation of the singlet-triplet separation by a HF-type exchange integral between π and π*. The time independent DFT methods (ΔSCF and RSCF-CV-DFT) afford triplet energies that are functional independent and close to those obtained by ATDDFT. However, both the singlet energies and the singlet-triplet separations increases with the fraction α of HF exchange. This trend can readily be explained in terms of the modest magnitude of a KS-exchange integral between π and π* in comparison to the much larger HF-exchange integral. It was shown that a fraction α of 0.5 affords good estimates of both the singlet energies and the singlet-triplet separations in comparison to several ab initio benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".