X-ray and Trichroic Infrared Orientation Analyses of Uniaxially Stretched PA6 and MXD6 Nanoclay Composite Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cast films of aliphatic (PA6) and aromatic (MXD6) nylons and their in situ polymerized nanocomposites with 4 wt % clay were prepared by an extrusion process and rapid cooling using an air knife. The precursor films were then uniaxially stretched at 110 °C with draw ratios varying from 1.5 to 5. The changes in orientation of clay and crystal axes of all the crystalline phases and amorphous region were examined using X-ray diffraction and Trichroic Infrared analyses. The clay alignment was measured with three different techniques: FTIR peak deconvolution, FTIR interactive spectral subtraction and X-ray diffraction. It was found that the clay platelets are mainly oriented in the machine direction (MD) and their orientation improved upon uniaxial stretching. X-ray analysis showed that γ crystals (designated as γ 1 ) of both nylons were mainly formed during rapid cooling of cast films. However, only the PA6/clay films showed an extra γ crystal population (designated as γ 2 ). WAXD and FTIR analyses revealed that the c -axis of γ 1 crystal population was oriented in the normal and transverse directions (ND and TD), while the c -axis of γ 2 was aligned in the normal direction (ND), indicating that this later crystal population formed perpendicular to the (001) plane of the clay platelets. The orientation of γ 1 and γ 2 crystal populations increased after uniaxial deformation. The MXD6 showed very little crystallinity due to its higher stiffness and low relaxation rate of the aromatic chains. The amorphous region had a lower orientation in the nanocomposite films due to the spatial hindrance caused by the presence of clay platelets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".