MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333311869 · doi:10.1055/s-0030-1256379

Colonoscopy complicated by arterial avulsion and retroperitoneal hemorrhage

2011· article· en· W2333311869 on OpenAlex
Kai Langer, S.G. Kriegler, Mike Moser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCase Reports on Hematomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColonoscopyEmergency departmentSurgeryAbdominal painAvulsionGeneral surgeryAbdominal hysterectomyHysterectomyRetroperitoneal hemorrhageRadiologyInternal medicineColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 77-year-old woman with a past surgical history of hysterectomy presented to the Emergency Department with increasing lower abdominal and back pain. A routine screening colonoscopy had been performed 8 hours previously; the endoscopist had noted that the colon was tortuous, however no abnormality had been seen. Abdominal palpation demonstrated moderate generalized lower abdominal tenderness. Her white blood cell count (WBC) was found to be elevated at 24 10 9 /L. An urgent computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a fluid density mass in the pelvis ( " Fig. The spleen and liver were normal, and no free air was visualized. Laparotomy revealed a large retroperitoneal and retrorectal hematoma with only minimal blood in the abdomen. Adhesions between the colon and vaginal vault gave the rectosigmoid a tight S-shape, and a segment approximately 10 cm in length was ischemic. A branch of the superior rectal artery that had been avulsed could be identified. It is likely that during her colonoscopy, in the process of getting the 'tight S' into a shape that the colonoscope could navigate, the artery gave way as it had less resistance than the tight adhesions. Hartman's procedure was performed. The most common complications of colonoscopy include hemorrhage (0.2 % -0.5 %) and perforation (0.9 % -0.1 %) The presence of fluid in the pelvis on CT scanning could make one think of a perforation; however, the lack of free air would make a perforation unlikely and hemorrhage more likely. Our patient remained hemodynamically stable because the bleeding remained retroperitoneal, which provided some degree of tamponade. The scenario of a patient presenting to the emergency department after colonoscopy, particularly with abdominal tenderness, should make one very suspicious of a complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it