Internal, Imaginary and Ontological Exile in Peter Urpeth’s Far Inland (2006)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper proposes to examine how Peter Urpeth, in his first published novel Far Inland (2006), attempted to re-write the traditional dichotomies between island and city, magic and reality, origin and exile.Central to the issues of exile and return, the notions of change, solitude (whether it is voluntary or not) and solipsism will be explored through the analysis of a novel set in Lewis that focuses on the figure of the wanderer. The latter’s homecoming is the occasion for Urpeth to explore the place of origin through space, time and spirituality. By resorting to an imposing array of symbols inspired from Inuit shamanism, Urpeth suggests the possibility of a return to an original, pre-Christian and re-enchanted Scotland. While considering how this new (?) proposal for an alternative collective identity is grounded in the paradoxical notion of ontological exile, the paper offers to inscribe the novel within the desire, shown by many contemporary Scottish artists, to “re-imagine” Scotland and provide it with new surfaces of inscription and existential territories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".