MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333407321 · doi:10.1021/ie102316b

Scale-up of a Pharmaceutical Roller Compaction Process Using a Joint-Y Partial Least Squares Model

2011· article· en· W2333407321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsProSensus (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRibbonPartial least squares regressionScale (ratio)CompactionProcess (computing)Computer scienceProduct (mathematics)MathematicsEngineeringStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Garcia-Munoz et al. [Garcia-Munoz, S.; Kourti, T.; MacGregor, J. F. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 79, 101–114] proposed a new latent variable regression methodology, joint-Y partial least squares (JYPLS), for product transfer between plants. In this paper, this method is used for product scale-up from a type of laboratory-scale roller compactor, a Fitzpatrick IR220, to a type of full-scale roller compactor, a Fitzpatrick IR520, in the pharmaceutical industry. A JYPLS model is first built with the data set collected from historical experiments on these two types of compactors. The JYPLS model relates API mass fraction, excipient mass factions, and roller compaction process measurements to ribbon properties. A constrained optimization is then formulated to invert the JYPLS model to find the key process settings of the Fitzpatrick IR520 to make the same quality of ribbon using the same raw materials formulation as the ribbon that had been produced on the Fitzpatrick IR220.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.396
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it