Medical Management of Tumors Associated With Kasabach-Merritt Phenomenon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (KMP) is a rare consumptive coagulopathy characterized by profound thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia occurring in association with the vascular tumors kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) and tufted angioma (TA). Treatment remains challenging without consensus on the optimal medical management. The authors compiled expert opinions regarding management to establish treatment recommendations. Twenty-seven vascular anomalies centers in the United States and Canada were surveyed using 2 representative cases of KHE/TA with and without KMP. Overall response rate was 92% (25/27) with 88% completion (24/27). Most sites (23/25; 92%) do not have a standard of practice for management. The most frequent initial therapy for KHE+KMP was a combination of systemic corticosteroids and vincristine (VCR) (12/24 centers; 50%) followed by corticosteroids alone (29%). Second-line treatments were VCR (38%), rapamycin (21%), and propranolol (21%). Management of KHE/TA without KMP was variable; initial treatments included systemic corticosteroids (8/24; 33%) alone or with VCR (9/24; 38%), monitoring without medication (33%), VCR (8%), propranolol (8%), aspirin (4%), and rapamycin (4%). This survey highlights certain trends in the management of KMP-associated tumors, without standard protocols and consensus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".