O1-S08.03 Condom use during work time among female sex workers in Benin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Condom use remains the cornerstone of HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa where HIV transmission is predominantly heterosexual. The aim of this study conducted in Cotonou, Benin, was to determine factors associated with unprotected sex among female sex workers (FSW), an important core group for the transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI). Methods We have recruited and followed 396 FSW in a reference center for STI treatment. Condom use was assessed at enrolment and 6 months thereafter. FSW were asked how often they have used condoms with their clients during the last 7 days of work. During the study, FSW were encouraged to always use condoms with their clients. A generalised estimating equation model for binomial distribution with repeated measures was used to isolate factors independently associated with failure to use condoms during any sexual act. Results The cohort comprised 1) 149 HIV-positive FSW, of which 52 were treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 97 were not yet eligible for ART and 2) 247 HIV-negative subjects. Mean age (standard deviation; sd) and mean number of clients (sd) during the last 7 days of work were, respectively, 33.8 (9.3) years and 28.4 (26.1) clients. The majority of the FSW (55.3%) did not practice in brothels or equivalent set ups. At enrolment, 5.6% of the FSW reported that they have never used condoms during the last week of work. The proportion of FSW with full use of condoms during the last 7 days of work increased from 77.8% at enrolment to 90.6% 6 months after. First assessment of condom use (enrolment into the study) [RR 2.17; 95% CI 1.44% to 3.26%], not working in a brothel (RR 2.22; 95% CI 1.39% to 3.54%), having a relatively low monthly income (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.04% to 2.57%) and older age (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.21%) were independently associated with failure to always use condoms with the clients. Being HIV-infected or being treated with ART was not associated with the issue of interest. The reasons reported by the FSW for not using condoms during the last sexual act were dominated by the refusal of the client (46.0%). Conclusion As suggested by our results, interventions promoting condom use during any commercial sexual act are fruitful and need to target women outside brothels, economically more vulnerable and older FSW as well as their clients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".