MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2333527753 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-3094

Abstract 3094: MiRNAs 484 and 210 control Pax-5 expression and function in breast cancer.

2013· article· en· W2333527753 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Harquail, Gilles A. Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNABiologyCancerCancer researchUntranslated regionBreast cancerCancer cellRegulation of gene expressionGene silencingContext (archaeology)Gene expressionGeneMessenger RNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Every hour, approximately 21 people are diagnosed with cancer where 9 will succumb to their disease. Recent studies have enabled the identification of important factors regulating cancer progression, one of these being the Pax-5 gene. Pax-5, an essential developmental factor, is aberrantly expressed in various B cell cancer lesions and solid tumors such as carcinoma. Although Pax-5 downstream activity is well characterized, the regulation of aberrant Pax-5 expression in a cancer specific context is poorly understood. To investigate the regulation of Pax-5 expression, we turned our attention to micro-RNAs (miRNAs). MiRNAs are highly conserved, small non-coding RNA molecules that regulate key biological processes. Extensive studies also show their deregulation in multiple cancer lesions. This study aims to elucidate a correlation between differentially expressed miRNAs in cancer cells and deregulated Pax-5 expression levels. Using bioinformatics platforms we observe that miRNAs 484, and 210 are aberrantly expressed in breast cancer cells and cross-reference with their capacity to target the Pax-5 mRNA 3’ untranslated region (UTR 3’). Using anti-miRNAs transfected into Pax-5 expressing breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MB231), we demonstrate that miRNAs 484 and 210 are capable of regulating Pax-5 expression. In addition, miRNA-regulated Pax-5 expression resulted in a concomitant alteration in Pax-5-dependant phenotype and cancer processes. This is the first study demonstrating the regulation of Pax-5 expression and function by non-coding RNAs in cancer cells. We believe that the aberrant expression of Pax-5 in cancer cells is in part due to deregulated miRNA expression profiles. This study will bring insight in regards to cancer regulating processes associated with miRNA and Pax-5 deregulations, thus helping us to better understand the aberrant Pax-5 expression levels within cancerous states. This study can therefore provide the eventual possibility of earlier, more efficient diagnostics as well as more targeted treatments for cancer patients. Citation Format: Jason M. Harquail, Gilles A. Robichaud. MiRNAs 484 and 210 control Pax-5 expression and function in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3094. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-3094

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→