MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333552323 · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e31821763b4

Website Review

2011· article· en· W2333552323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane E. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlossaryRehabilitationApplied psychologyPsychological interventionCognitionPsychologyIntervention (counseling)Computer scienceMedicinePhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of the website Strokengine Assess is to provide current information about outcome measures used in stroke management. Sixty outcome measures are reviewed, spanning body structure/function, activity, and participation constructs. In addition to measures commonly used by physical therapists in neurological practice, measures of language, cognition, depression, and perception are included. Outcome measures are organized both alphabetically and by domain. Navigation buttons for each measure allow the reader to view an in-depth review of the measure, summary table, details regarding psychometric properties, and links to view or purchase the measure. The psychometric information includes up-to-date references as well as links to other similar measures for comparison. A helpful “mouse-over” psychometric glossary and a link to a table of descriptive statistical evaluation criteria supplement the psychometric review and may be particularly useful for novice clinicians and students. Clinically useful information such as equipment required, administration time, scoring information, and available language versions is also provided. Recommendations are made about client suitability (for whom the measure is/is not appropriate). Hypertext links to other stroke-related Web sites can be found throughout the site as well as a direct link to StrokEngine, a companion site that contains information and evidence reviews about interventions used in stroke rehabilitation. Strokengine Assess is designed for the rehabilitation student, clinician, or researcher. The companion site, Strokengine, also contains consumer information in the form of a series of “patient/family” questions/answers on each intervention. Both sites are clearly written, easily navigable, and well referenced. The author of each outcome measure review on Strokengine Assess is clearly identified. All tools have been updated within the last 2 years. The website was developed and is maintained by the Canadian Stroke Network and McGill University. The Web site was last accessed on December 10, 2010. Jane E. Sullivan, PT, DHS Associate Professor Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, Illinois

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurologic Physical TherapySame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207