MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333651513 · doi:10.5594/j12405

Message from Editorial Vice-President

2003· article· en· W2333651513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMPTE Motion Imaging Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bio-Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVice presidentComputer scienceTelecommunicationsManagementEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

technical Journal to "disseminate scientific information concerning the motion picture, television and allied arts and sciences."SMPTE has a long history of documenting development and advances in the motion imaging field.We started of course with film, then added television imaging and recording, and now new methods of both recording, file-based storage, and dissemination by means such as the internet.I am writing this from my company's offices in New York and often wonder what Thomas Edison, a motion imaging pioneer if there ever was one, would think of the new systems, methods, and the truly amazing quality we have achieved.The SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal is a peer-reviewed publication.Unlike many magazines in our industry, Journal papers are vetted by a team of industry experts for technical content.LeRoy DeMarsh, retired from Eastman Kodak, is the Chairman of our Board of Editors.Board members, whose names appear every month on the Journal's masthead page, volunteer their time to read, comment, and correct

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it