Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index: Responsive to Short-term Change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite documented feasibility, reliability, and validity, the Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) has yet to be demonstrated to be sensitive to change in the time frame of acute treatment trials. We evaluated short-term responsiveness and determined the minimal change in PCDAI score associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in disease activity. METHODS: Standardized effect size (SES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated as measures of responsiveness among pediatric patients being treated for acute exacerbations of Crohn disease 1) in a regular clinical practice setting and 2) as part of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the minimal PCDAI score change associated with significant clinical improvement used as the gold standard in 1) physician global assessment of change and in 2) change in adult Crohn disease activity index (CDAI). RESULTS: Among responders, the SES and SRM of the PCDAI were 1.78 and 1.41 (95% CI: 0.89-1.92) and 2.10 and 1.95 (95% CI: 1.70-2.20) in the clinical practice setting and RCT setting, respectively. The optimal minimal PCDAI change score associated with clinically significant change in physician global assessment was determined to be -12.5 (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 92.3%). In the RCT setting a change in PCDAI of -10 corresponded to a change in CDAI of not greater-than-or-equal 70 points. CONCLUSIONS: The PCDAI is responsive to improvement in disease activity in Crohn disease patients over a short interval. As such, the PCDAI is an appropriate instrument to use in pediatric acute treatment trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".